A few points on this. First, attributes don't really matter that much. You clearly shouldn't try to cast spells if you have INT 8, but 14-15 is already quite hard to distinguish from a full fledged 18 INT caster. Currently I play a build where the attributes are 10 15 15 15 10 15. It works perfectly and at top performance in many roles. That's because in Fractured no archetype is based on a single attribute. Warriors needs Strenght, Dexterity, Consitution, Perception and Charisma. They all contribute to swinging your weapon. Mages need Constitution, Perception, Intelligence and Charisma. Dexterity helps too. Archers need Dexterity, Constitution, Intelligence, Perception and Charisma. Same for Street rats. Out of 6 attributes in the game, you always need at the very least 4. So, can I run a mage with 14 INT? Yes I can, and it will be as good as a 18 INT mage, It will just be built and played differently, leaning more on the other mage stats apart from INT. This was actually made possible by this last alpha. In the previous one, the attributes were far more effective at "locking" you into a specific role, since there was a big bonus that unlocked when reaching 20 in an attribute. I actually made an identical post to yours in the past, because I felt it actually was an issue. With this last design of attributes though, I no longer have problems with it. Second point, you CAN respec the attribute points. In the tests you have a free respec every week. In the release you will have one free respec for each char.

That happens when your woodcutting skill is low and you miss the tree.

@Logain it's just a sheet to help players to distribute the 100 or 120 race points and to understand the creating system. I created this worksheet on may 2018 so it's not too soon :)- .

@albuswolfer said in Enhanced Character Creation: @tulukaruk and what about the deerkin? If we are going by "earth like" logic, I guess that deer-kin (hart-kin) and bear-kin would not have tails (or would have short ones), but tiger-kin and wolf-kin would (have longer tails). Demons would also have tails, only different kind of tails, not furry ones like beast-kin but demon like tails. Angels would lose tails, and abominations tails would fall off?

@Gothix I know i'm quite late and the party is long overdue, there's no more rum, and the hookers are exhausted... I'm still going to drop this. Even though acceptable behavior is indeed subjected to cultural (more likely survival compromises dictated by ecosystem that have become traditions and stuck even though the reasons behind them are overdue) dominance, there still exist what the ancient Romans defined as "natural rights". They recognized such rights to slaves and animals and even objects. It basically refers to not deliberately hurt another without proper cause. Yes the Romans where businessman and profit was proper cause. But they where acknowledging it as an evil act. Also, selflessly helping another will always be an act of good. Therefore. Good and Evil can be universally defined. What confuses people is the judicial recognition of an act as acceptable or unacceptable in a certain law system. That is indeed subjective to context. In the same country, under the same administration, death sentence is forbidden during peacetime and common during wartime! Still it will always be recognized as a necessary evil!

Effettivamente siamo ad una fase troppo iniziale del gioco