Navigation

    Fractured Forum

    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Zetskey
    Z
    • Profile
    • Following
    • Followers
    • Topics
    • Posts
    • Best
    • Groups

    Zetskey

    @Zetskey

    1
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    264
    Profile views
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    Zetskey Follow

    Best posts made by Zetskey

    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      You have 40 people, you offer them one free 3day key to a friend (maybe 2). Now you've at most increased your possible player count by 200% which is a good max for early stress testing. Then once you find out it's stable at ~100 people you open a larger stress test. That's one of a few ways I can think of. @Xzoviac This game is still alpha so a small stress test like that makes perfect sense.

      Basically you don't throw your game into the deep end as your first server stress test if you're new to server administration &/OR MMO creation. It's just asking to run into major issues. It would have been easier and less of a nightmare for them if they did a small test first. Otherwise you get frustrated people like me who honestly thought the game looked cool and the design was neat but can't trust that these people know what they're doing for me to give them my money at any point down the road.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey

    Latest posts made by Zetskey

    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      @Gibbx
      Yah man that's my only reason to give criticism. Just to cause trouble because all criticism is just to cause trouble. Man some people seem to not like it when their game is criticized. I guess calling my post asinine is the only way to attack my critique for you. I've yet to say anything excessively negative about individuals or call out people as "trash" or "twat" as some people have done to me.

      All i've said is that this whole thing was a huge debacle and their response has been lack luster. They said it was a critical server issue but they have a window message that pops up saying that people can still play if they have paid. So those two things together is what I feel is dishonest. That is what all this stems from. If the window I got when logging in was, in fact, wrong and no one can get on the server then so be it but that is not the error message displayed when I logged in.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      @NotAPumpkin said in Uninspired Confidence:

      @Zetskey have you ever thought that maybe they just don't have a good response so they are telling you what they know in that period of time? If they don't know the answer they can't give you on so they are working on an answer. If you're interested in the game and development, that should be good enough for you.

      Except ambiguity only shows the lack of preparation for a response to a situation such as this which only reinforces my original issue.

      @NotAPumpkin

      The problem is that you immediately came out and started attacking them as a company. Grow up. You sound like an immature twat. If you're a "professional" as you say - then you should know this stuff happens all the time and even still happens to the big giant MMOs. I know WoW Classic even had issues at their launch. ArcheAge just rebooted and they had similar issues with servers crashing, excessive queue times, games dropping, etc.

      I never said i was a "professional". I stated that I have experience. I also mentioned archeage had problems but then added that those problems were nowhere near as severe as this one. So again, this is reinforcing my initial criticism. Also mentioning WoW classic doesn't really help either as the issues they faced weren't as catastrophic and even so blizzard had a response other than "we'll tell you tomorrow". So that too only reinforces my criticism of the fact they didn't seem prepared in the slightest given their current response, or lack thereof.

      @NotAPumpkin

      The problem is that you immediately came out and started attacking them as a company. Grow up. You sound like an immature twat. If you're a "professional" as you say - then you should know this stuff happens all the time and even still happens to the big giant MMOs. I know WoW Classic even had issues at their launch. ArcheAge just rebooted and they had similar issues with servers crashing, excessive queue times, games dropping, etc.

      It's called criticism and I have the right to give mine. Also calling me a twat just immediately crumbles whatever platform you have to dust so you should probably not do it.

      @Kralith

      i really don't understand your rant about the need to stop the test.
      That was the first Stresstest ever for this game.
      We all expected it can happen, that it fails.
      And it failed, for whatever reason.
      But thats exactly why they needed to do a stresstest, to look if the server can handle more than 100 people at the same time.

      This was part of my criticism. I'd like to state someone else stated this wasn't their first stress test but you seem to think it was. If this is true that only adds to the problem. This isn't when or how a "first" stress test should be conducted if it was in fact the first one given all the information I've been told. If the information I have been told is wrong then I can only work off the information that is given to me.

      I also never said ever that I made games. So i don't know where you got that from. I said I've had experience with server administration on multiplayer servers.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      @Jikap Having the server down for the latter half of the first day and then abruptly ending the stress test is one of the worst stress tests ive ever seen for any mmo or game release. I even played archeage from early closed & open beta during every stress test and for how bad that was it never crashed and then abruptly ended in the first day. I keep having to repeat myself that I have 0 problem with them finding bugs, I have 0 problems with the server crashing, I have 0 problems with them taking the server down for the unknown eta, I have tons of problems with their mishandling of the situation. It's not ONE thing that i have a problem with its everything coupled with their seemingly off the cuff response to the issue and problem.

      im not trying to piss off individual people. I'm giving my opinion of the situation and why that situation has pushed me to not having confidence in the dev team. Can they get better? sure. Is this game doomed to fail period? No. Do I personally think, based on what I've seen from this situation that this team inspires confidence? No. Can that change? Sure. I haven't called anyone names, I haven't said the dev team is trash, I haven't done anything but give my critique on the problem and it's specific reaction from me. Probably not the nicest critique but it's not like I'm sitting here trash talking individual developers.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      @Xzoviac said in Uninspired Confidence:

      Must be nice being Captain hindsight

      It's not captain hindsight it's literally doing this in my own life. I've ran servers with larger groups before and have stress tested servers. It's not "oh hindsight is 2020" its called experience and looking at history where other game devs have failed and succeeded in similar endeavors. But sure, lets just make fun of me. Now i certainly want to join a community where criticism is met with heckling.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      @Specter Like I said. There's two people now making conflicting claims and I still don't have any confidence in either being correct. Doesn't change the absolute disaster this is. I had to spend time downloading this game cuz at&t is absolute garbage where I am so I couldn't do anything online really while this downloaded. I then couldn't log in cuz they werent 'slowly expanding the amount of players over time', then I had to wait for maintenance for an unknown amount of time with literally no ETA, then I get told that the whole thing is cancelled and only paid for accounts can play at this time, and I am told that the reason for all this will be said 'tomorrow' instead of today. I can't know for sure any of what you say is true, regardless I still don't get the sense that this game is going to go anywhere with how this particular situation was handled. Every response from the dev team to this issue seems to be handled on the spot with no preparation for this kind of possibility.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      @Specter Great they should have tried 100 people first before jumping into the deep end with this disaster weekend. That only furthers my point about doing a smaller stress test before this cliff dive.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      You have 40 people, you offer them one free 3day key to a friend (maybe 2). Now you've at most increased your possible player count by 200% which is a good max for early stress testing. Then once you find out it's stable at ~100 people you open a larger stress test. That's one of a few ways I can think of. @Xzoviac This game is still alpha so a small stress test like that makes perfect sense.

      Basically you don't throw your game into the deep end as your first server stress test if you're new to server administration &/OR MMO creation. It's just asking to run into major issues. It would have been easier and less of a nightmare for them if they did a small test first. Otherwise you get frustrated people like me who honestly thought the game looked cool and the design was neat but can't trust that these people know what they're doing for me to give them my money at any point down the road.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      Again, I have 0 problem with them finding a bug. I expected as much anyways. If what you say is true about how the server only had 30-40 people tops then they shouldn't even have had this stress test to begin with. You shouldn't even be having a server stress test for your game until you have a stability with at least 70-100 people. Partly cuz if you offer a 3 day free wekeend you're gonna get atleast 100 additional people. That's ~350% increase in player base on a server you have no idea will be stable or not if your normal is 30 people. That only reinforces my understanding that they were not even close to being ready for this kinda of test.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • RE: Uninspired Confidence

      That's great and all but that's not really my issue. My issue is not "guess we don't get another stress test". It's "it really seems like they weren't even remotely ready to begin with" and got a bunch of sign ups under their belt that they can now use to gain investments or make claims with. Again, whether thats their intention or not I do not know for sure but this is how it seems to me.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey
    • Uninspired Confidence

      I saw this game was having a free weekend so I decided to download it. After getting into character screen with a laggy log in time, and creating a character I was greeted with, paraphrasing, "were sorry but were at capacity as we , over time, increase the amount of people allowed on our server for a stress test". Fair enough, I get it. So i waited until the next day, today, to log in and was greeted with a "under maintenance can't log in" window. So I waited again....for 8 hours, having no eta on your time of deployment I just overestimated. Then I patch your game, log in, click my character and I get another window telling me I will not be able to play as you have ended the free weekend abruptly due to technical difficulties with a "we'll tell you why tomorrow" sticker on it.

      Let me preface this with 'I understand server and technical issues, I work on servers and get that sometimes things just happen' but this is ridiculous. It's one thing if I could even log in and while playing notice instability issues, lag, what have you but I couldn't even do that. So I'm stuck wondering "what could have made the server crash so hard that it can't even be played on right now" but then I read the rest of your statement. Paid people can still play but not the free people you promised 3 days too and abruptly ended without warning or explanation. So then it's not a hard server issue its a "you guys clearly weren't remotely ready for a test", at least thats the way all of this comes off as. It's quite frankly a kick in the face and seems like a pr stunt whether that is your intention or not. You get a bunch of new people to make accounts to bolster your account numbers and create buzz only to kick them to the curb when its inconvenient for you, the people who invited us in.

      Now I can't say for sure everything is on the dev team fumbling the ball here. Maybe its something out of your control maybe it's not. The problem here is that you've offered no reasoning or logic behind your abrupt cancellation other than "we'll tell you later". Imagine being invited into someones home and then abruptly getting the boot before you have done or said anything only to be told "you'll know why sometime later in the future if you stick around". Why should I stick around?

      You started this weekend with an expanding server capacity, which is probably the smartest thing the team did, and then ended it with a cliff dive off the deep end. You have no offer of when you might reinstate the promised 3 day play but bank on people being understanding that it's a server issue with no real understanding of what type of server issue while simultaneously allowing paid players to play; which throws shade on whether or not you are being truthful.

      Note: In case it's not clear. I know that they SAID its spatialOS but my intention here is to state that this whole process makes me wonder if it really is that; it's not to say that they don't actually know. It's the way they've displayed the information and don't seem to give a real reason or give this "it's not us its them" logic.

      posted in Discussions & Feedback
      Z
      Zetskey